I would appreciate your prayers as I finish my last semester at IUPUI. The degree I started 10 years ago is almost finished. I must say that (when I finish, DV) it is one of my best acomplishments; it is also one of the greatest testaments of God’s kindness in my life. School has been tough. As a full-time worker, father, husband and recent seminary student, there were times I was ready to give up. Indeed, I quit for a few years, but returned to finish what I started. I hope it was the right move. Crossing this finish line is rewarding, not from qualitative standpoint, but from a perspective of endurance.
From an educational standpoint, the degree has been close to worthless. But it might serve my family in other ways as I move forward–possibly out of state–to find a new job and line of work. In a strange irony my best semesters have been the ones in which my load was heaviest. This semester I loaded up with with 18 credits (6 classes), my busiest ever. But I did so in order to graduate this May. I have a chance of securing an all-A semster which I desperately need to salvage my overall GPA that has been weakened by my bad choices in the past. Pray for my focus and discipline that I might finish strong.
And pray for my family these last two days of a race that started a decade ago.
Below, in all of its pathetic splendor, are the definitions and examples of anti-Semitism provided by the tax dollars of Brits. UK citizens are about 90 percent Honkie by 2001 stats. And by honkie, I mean white gentiles. Following below are the words of a report to the British Parliament on “anti-Semitism”. You will also find some of my commentary in bold. I trust that you will receive an education in true politically-correctness if you read to the end. Enjoy, as we Americans also prepare for the extension of the plantation to include these fields of pc-thought. They already exists in Cananda and most European countries. Continue reading ‘Antisemitism: From UK to US’
MLB gets good grade in diversity hiring.
The grade is an A- even though black representation is down a few tenths of a percentage point, because blacks “just aren’t playing it at this point.” Efforts are still underway to get blacks out of inner-cities interested in baseball. A few questions: Why do you want more blacks playing if they are not interested? Why not let their parents turn them on to baseball? That’s how whites are introduced to baseball. Secondly, given the criminal stigma that is directly linked to black-representation (in sports and civilization), why would you encourage inviting more into your sport (Think of NBA and NFL)? The Jews who predominantly push for civil rights represent the ownership of many MLB clubs. They are learning that they can’t have their cake and eat it to. Also, the report fails to mention the growth of Hispanics in the sport. They are about 25 percent of MLB rosters (3 years ago and growing); thus more jobs are taken from whites than blacks. Racial-tension expert Lapchick had no comments on this.
Furthermore MLB received a C+ for gender hiring. Apparently we need more women wearing man-suits even though they cannot perform like men—the true leaders by nature and calling. In our idolatrous “scientific world” we ironically do not choose to venerate the statistics that show consistent IQ superiority of men over women, and consistent violent-crime superiority of blacks and Hispanics over whites.
Many “conservatives” today realize the phenomena of reverse-discrimination, but limit its victims to “the truly qualified.” Sure, but the truly qualified almost always is the white man. The exceptions are the white men who are sissies and pagan. Thus the enemy is the white, Christian, heterosexual dude. Just watch the men on sitcoms, the news reporters. Simply observe the university professors. Or listen and watch many bought-pastors and self-desginated Christian leaders. Even the ones that speak with boldness never call down women in the workplace, and probably think women “can do a good job in politics.” They watch too much TV and are proabably afraid of their “out-spoken” wives. They would get a A- too.
Good words from a dear friend on the “Press”. Read the rest of Chris Gault’s entry at his new blog.
The media tells us not only what happened, but how we are to think about what happened. It is simple to see, they do not even try to hide the fact that they are doing so. They are perhaps the most duplicitous pawns at the heart of our nation’s troubles. They feign to be the eyes and ears of the people; and that may be true to an extent, but they are selective eyes and ears. What they are not telling you is just as, if not more, important than what they do tell you.
The use of B.C.E./C.E has always bothered me. Actually the reasoning behind its use is what bothers me. Here is the reasoning for using this “academic” and “scholarly” dating paradigm:
Most students will be accustomed to dating ancient events as either A.D. (which does not stand for “After Death,” but for “anno domini,” Latin for “year of our Lord”) or B.C. (”Before Christ”). This terminology may make sense for Christians, for whom A.D. 1996 [the first published date of the text] is indeed “the year of our Lord 1996.” It makes less sense, though, for Jews, Muslims, and others for whom Jesus is not the “Lord” or the Christ.” Scholars have therefore begun to use a different set of abbreviations as more inclusive of others outside the Christian tradition. In this book I will follow the alternative designations of C.E. (”the Common Era,” meaning common to people of all faiths who utilize the traditional Western Calendar) and B.C.E.(”Before the Common Era”). In terms of the older abbreviations, then, C.E. corresponds to A.D. and B.C.E. to B.C.
Bart Ehrman, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Fourth Edition. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008) p.9
Do those who issue this rationale not realize that the fulcrum of either dating paradigm is the birth of Christ? The scholars are but changing the names of the history markers, but keeping the immutable point at which history swings: namely the birth of the Lord of time and space.
So whether you are a Jew, Muslim, or a scholar, your birthday and all of history is measured in this ”inclusive” dating scheme by its relationship to the birth of the true Lord. Whether you acknowledge him or not is irrelevant.
He is still Lord.
Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut is a good short-story dystopia that all should read. It is relevant to our times as much as it was to any past time in which its theme was seemingly more material. It would even be a good story to read as a group if you wanted to have discussion after a night of entertaining/dining your guests.
If you are interested in the relationship between conspiracy and truth, read it then read my thoughts below. This will serve as a primer to my forthcoming post Conspiracy and Credibility.
********************************************
Continue reading ‘Conspiracy and Learning’
Israel is a criminal, racist, anti-Christ state by the definitions of their own laws and religion. Yes, all their Middle-Eastern neighbors hate them. Yes, these countries have threatened to destroy Israel. Yes, Israel has no muscular and cultural parity in the Middle-East. Perhaps they would be doomed if the US didn’t give them 300 billion a year and their goyim/Christian military to destroy their stronger, more cultured, nations. But they are sovereign. They must be cut off. They must fight their own wars which they started by stealing land from the Palestinians.
And McCain needs to read the Talmud. What a fool. As soon as the cameras shut down they must of bleached the prayer wall of his gentile filth.
Go here to see a piece and a video about McCain’s visit to Israel. Notice the propaganda in the video of the Palestinian rockets the Jews are storing to show the abuse of the wicked Arabs. The article forgot to include these pictures of Israel’s bombs that mutilate Palestinians. WARNING: GRAPHIC
For the first time ever, I may vote Democrat. But perhaps I’m deluded. After all, when all three major candidates sent their representatives to a Jewish brown-nosing meeting, it was Hilary’s rep who stated, “The role of the President of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel.” Why there was no objection from the others to this obvious conceptual departure to the President’s real role as laid out in the Constitution is why I might be wrong in voting Democrat. But until Obama wears a yamaka, and parades in the Holy Land for Jewish sympathy he’s my man. I can’t vote for a woman because I’m a Christian. But the Christian voter might consider, given our unique circumstances, that this election should be about picking the guy who stands the best chance to start the revolution that can fix this nation. How long will white Americans continue to foot the entitlement bills to those who are statistically the most anti-white group in America. Interracial crime is virtually one way. How long will the heart of America take a President who puts the “black community” before sanity. He will not disown his clearly anti-white pastor, but will demonize a man for saying that we would be better off with segregation. Segregation to some equals “black hatred”, while to others it means eliminating nearly 40,000 black on white rapes per year. But lower race-related physical crimes is not “better off”–lower race-related hate crimes is. (Do you see the power of PC? It short-circuits critical thinking, and cancels the exploration of historical and logical perspective.)
America would not tolerate Obama, and that is why he will not win. But candidates selected by true faith and sound reason are never the candidates who are allowed to win.
This is spot on. This is why we must learn to be critical thinkers. This is why we must turn the tube off and do our own research on current events, politics, etc.
These are Zionist euphemisms from another site.
Continue reading ‘The Language of Zionism’
I think I may have posted the link to this some time ago. But its worth another look.
This is the best, concise treatment of the issue of Christ and Culture I have seen. In this exchange by Wilson and Horton, the reader will come accross every significant issue in the debate over whether there should/can be a Christian culture. Apart from the one who denies Christ’s concern for culture, everyone has a positon that is a variaton of either Wilson’s or Horton’s. But there is a wide gulf between these two sets of variations.
Wherever you lie on this issue, you should be able to deal with the crucial issues that come up in this exchange. Understand the thesis statements, as well as the stock support and objections for each. Then you will have done well.
You can then check back here for some commentary, which I hope will contribute to this debate in new ways. Until then, take 8 minutes to Tolle Lege.
Latest Comments
RSS